Having read huge amounts of Science Fiction literature when I was younger, I am always a little jealous of people who have chosen SF as their academic field. Oh, the joy when I will now finally get the chance to write a paper together of one of those persons who can attend an SF convention and (with good conscience) say that he is actually "working" (although I have done it once myself).
So I have submitted a 500-word abstract together with the literature scholar Jerry Määttä (Uppsala University) that combines our interests and that fits the theme of the academic track at the upcoming 75th World Science Fiction Convention (Wikipedia) to be held in Helsinki in August next year. The theme of the academic track is “100 Years of Estrangement”. From the call:
"Estrangement, or defamiliarization (ostranenie), has long been a crucial concept in our understanding of speculative fiction. Since its first appearance in Viktor Shklovsky’s essay “Art as Technique” (or “Art as Device”) in 1917, estrangement has made its way into the theories of prose fiction, of theatre, and of film, and it forms the core of some of the foundational works in the theory of science fiction"
Proposals about various topics related to the concept "estrangement" are encouraged, including but not limited to:
- What is the dynamic between defamiliarization, mental transportation and identification? How do estranging and fantastical effects impact the reader’s perception of the storyworld or sympathy towards the characters?
- How do works of speculative fiction balance estranging or defamiliarizing techniques and the naturalizing effects inherent to its worldbuilding and characterization? How does defamiliarization relate to the realistic illusions created by speculative fiction?
- How is defamiliarization used in fantastic genres to question or critique societal issues and/or social identity categories (e.g. gender, sexuality, ethnicity, age, social class)?
Our submissions is all about estrangement/defamiliarization and it's partly about Science Fiction too, but it's also partly about (engineering) education. It is in fact the first out of several papers I plan to write about ways of visualizing the extravagant use of resources (primarily energy) that we nowadays assume is "normal", but from a historical point of view in no way is.
I'm not sure I will attend the world SF conference but my co-author Jerry will. He has in fact already bought his ticket and he will also be the presenter of our paper there should it be accepted.
Estranging Energy:
Teaching Abstract Concepts
through Making Strange
Jerry Mättä, Department of Literature, Uppsala University and Daniel Pargman, Department of Media Technology and Interaction Design, KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Few people intuitively grasp the energy needs of our everyday technology (smartphones, computers, cars), or indeed our bodies (the daily caloric intake), and it is often equally hard to understand the concomitant but invisible carbon emissions that are the result of our modern, high-energy technological lifestyle.
The aim of
this paper is to examine and discuss one possible way of alleviating these
difficulties, namely through the use of images, metaphors, and estrangement,
enabling especially students to defamiliarise abstract concepts such as energy
by forcing them to conceive these terms as concrete, tangible, and manipulable.
Apart from discussing estrangement as a concept and some of the numerous
interpretations and developments of Viktor Shklovsky’s ostranenie (not
least Bertolt Brecht’s Verfremdung and Darko Suvin’s cognitive
estrangement), this paper analyses a few examples where science fictional
estrangement can be used in teaching abstract concepts – in this case
pertaining to energy and sustainability.
For
instance, one way of defamiliarising students to the abstract concept of energy
is through the term or unit ‘energy slave’, standing for the potential energy
output of one well-fed and fully functional human being: 75 watts during an
8-hour day, for a total of 600 Wh (0.6 kWh) per day (Nikiforuk 2014; Avallone
et al. 2007). The ‘energy slave’ unit is thus comparable to the ‘horsepower’
unit – where one horsepower corresponds to about 10 energy slaves – but also to
fossil fuels, where a barrel of oil (159 litres) is “roughly equivalent to 25
000 hours of human labour” (McKibben 2011).
While the
invocation of the term ‘energy slave’ might be perceived as inappropriate in
some contexts (e.g. in a society that still grapples with the consequences of
actual historical slavery), we use it here due to the saying that, according to
the ancient Greek philosopher Protagoras, “man is the measure of all things”.
The term ‘energy slave’ brings a tangible, skin-in-the-game aspect to the act
of imagining or estranging energy, and through mental exercises such as this,
it becomes much easier to both make sense of and get a feeling for various
calculations about everyday energy consumption as well as our dependency on
fossil fuels.
Apart from
the fact that thought experiments on sustainability often read much like
science fiction in themselves (going back at least as far as the metaphor of
“Spaceship Earth”; see Höhler 2015), this paper examines how concepts that are
often used within literary scholarship, and particularly within science fiction
studies, can shed light on pedagogical challenges and didactic practices within
the field of teaching energy and sustainability. Besides the concept of ‘energy
slaves’, this paper also explores the didactic employment of images, metaphors,
and estrangement from works ranging from Jonathan Swift’s proto sf Gulliver’s
Travels (1726) to Paolo Bacigalupi’s The Windup Girl (2009).
References:
Avallone,
E.A., T. Baumeister III, T. & Sadegh, A.M. (2007). Marks' Standard
Handbook for Mechanical Engineers, 11th Edition. Mc-Graw Hill
Höhler, S.
(2015). Spaceship Earth in the Environmental Age, 1960-1990. Pickering
& Chatto
McKibben,
B. (2011). Eaarth: Making a Life on a Tough New Planet. Random House LLC
Nikiforuk,
A. (2014). The Energy of Slaves: Oil and the New Servitude. Greystone
Books Ltd.
Shklovsky,
V. (1917). “Art as Technique”, in Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays,
eds. Lee T. Lemon & Marion J. Reiss. U of Nebraska P (1965), pp. 3-24
Suvin, D.
(1979). Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a
Literary Genre. Yale University Press
Bios:
Jerry
Määttä is an Associate Professor at the Department of Literature at Uppsala
University, Sweden. He has published on science fiction, sociology of
literature, the Swedish book market, popular fiction, audio books, literary
prizes and awards, and has recently finished a project on British and American
apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic narratives in film and literature since ca.
1950.
Daniel
Pargman is an Associate Professor at the Department of Media Technology and
Interaction Design (MID) at KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden. He is
interested in energy research and social science, teaching sustainability and computing
within limits. He blogs at danielpargman.blogspot.com.
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar